- MSc in "Law and Information & Communication Technologies" - https://masters.ds.unipi.gr/MSc_Law_ICT/en -

Quality Policy

Quality Policy of the Academic Unit for the Development and Improvement of the MSc in “Law and Information and Communication Technologies”

1. Introduction

The quality policy of the Department of Digital Systems for the development and improvement of the MSc in “Law and Information and Communication Technologies” (hereinafter referred to as “Law and ICT” or the Program) is outlined in the following sections.

2. Quality Policy of the Academic Unit for the Development and Improvement of the MSc in “Law and ICT”

2.1 General Principles

The Quality Assurance Policy of the Department of Digital Systems is fully aligned with the quality policy of the University of Piraeus and reflects the institution’s core values. The Department ensures and enhances the quality of its teaching, research, and administrative activities, aiming for continuous improvement through the active participation and contribution of all its members.

The Department organizes and implements postgraduate programs of high standards in the fields of Informatics and Telecommunications, as well as interdisciplinary and cutting-edge areas, thus strengthening its academic identity, research effectiveness, and connection to labor market needs.

Furthermore, the Department is committed to fostering a creative environment of research, innovation, and employment for its academic, research, and administrative staff, and a supportive academic environment for its students. Quality is recognized as a fundamental element for realizing the Department’s vision and achieving its mission, making the creation of a quality culture essential.

In particular, the Department of Digital Systems and the MSc in “Law and ICT” are committed to applying a quality policy that promotes academic excellence while aligning with the program’s objectives. This policy ensures the participation of all stakeholders in implementing strategic goals through clearly defined actions and means, applying appropriate internal and external quality procedures for continuous improvement.

Additionally, the Department fosters communication and collaboration within the academic community, including faculty members, researchers, students, administrative staff, and other stakeholders.

2.2 Quality Assurance Procedures

The Department of Digital Systems and the MSc in “Law and ICT” implement quality assurance procedures as outlined by the Internal Quality Assurance System of the university, with necessary adjustments for second-cycle programs. These procedures are executed in collaboration with the university’s Quality Assurance Unitand serve as valuable tools for implementing the department’s teaching and research activities, achieving set objectives, and enhancing the overall academic output.

The specific procedures for monitoring and improving the quality of the MSc in “Law and ICT” include:

  1. Policy Implementation:
    A documented quality assurance policy defines the framework within which the program operates. This policy is publicly available on the program’s website.
  2. Resource Management:
    Efficient management of the program’s resources (staff, infrastructure, IT equipment) ensures the effective functioning and improvement of quality indicators.
  3. Annual Target Setting:
    Strategic goals are set annually, with quantitative and qualitative targets evaluated through specific metrics.
  4. Periodic Internal Evaluation:
    Internal evaluation assesses implemented procedures to identify best practices and areas for improvement.
  5. Data Collection and Analysis:
    Effective data collection and analysis ensure accurate, updated records, such as program structure, faculty performance, student outcomes, and support services.
  6. Information Dissemination:
    Program information is made accessible through the official website, ensuring clarity, relevance, and timely updates.
  7. External Evaluation:
    The program undergoes periodic external certification by the National Authority for Higher Education, involving independent expert committees.

2.2.1 Policy Objectives

These procedures aim to demonstrate:

This framework ensures the program’s compliance with legislation and university regulations while considering the feedback of students, alumni, and stakeholders.